Ten Reasons Why You Should Enter the Golden Rose …. By Nancy Brophy
1. You are a romance writer who hasn’t met the RWA qualifications for PAN (published author network).
2. Precursor to the Golden Heart and national recognition
3. Quality feedback from three writers (at least one of whom will be published)
4. Great judges in the final category
|
Contemporary Series Romance |
Nicole Fischer, Avon/HarperCollins |
|
Contemporary Single Title |
Rebecca Strauss, DeFiore and Company |
|
Historical |
Jennifer Udden, Donald Maass Agengy |
|
Mainstream Novel with Strong Romantic Elements |
Emily Ohanjanians, HQN |
|
Paranormal |
Amy Boggs, Donald Maass Agency |
|
Romantic Suspense |
Eric Ruben, Ruben Agency |
|
Young Adult |
Lauren Ruth, Entangled Publishing |
5. You are a contest slut and love flaunting your winnings. Oh, wait, that may only apply to me.
6. You support Rose City Romance Writers and we love you for it.
7. The idea of a real golden rose appeals to you – particularly since you won it.
8. You know you are a better writer than everyone else – and this will prove it.
9. 10,000 words – no synopsis until final round.
10. It wouldn’t hurt to give NY one more chance.
Here’s the URL. http://rosecityromancewriters.com/contest-home/
Entries accepted beginning June 1. Enter early. Enter often. Make Favorite Aunt Nancy proud.
Mother’s Day… by Nancy Brophy
This mother’s day weekend I’ve been missing my mother who died two years ago. I could use her use her wisdom and advice.
My mother was an early feminist. That designation was thrust upon her because she refused to follow the rules. When she graduated from college during WWII her career options were limited. Teachers, nurses or office help were available and very little else. Her father and grandfather were small town lawyers who had never told her that her gender would hold her back until she wanted to go to law school.
Her father believed she was bored because all the men were at war. But the war would eventually end and my mother would get married, so any money he spent on law school for a daughter would be wasted. He was wrong.
My mother did become a lawyer and practiced law for over fifty years. When the woman’s movement reached the forefront of American awareness in the late sixties, a lot of women were overjoyed to have thrown off the oppressive yolk of male domination. I, however, had not been raised with limited options. My mother raised me with these words. “You need to have a career, because while you might marry a man who can support you, he could die and you will have to go to work.”
We laugh at that advice now, because everyone works, but in the fifties and early sixties that was not true. The woman’s movement changed the relationship of men/women. As women became empowered, men struggled to figure out their role in a changing society.
Statements like, “a woman without a man is like a fish without a bicycle” told women it was okay if they weren’t marching in step with a man, but it didn’t tell men what their options were. The seventies were a decade where men did not fare well.
Fast forward to present day. The pendulum has definitely swung in the other direction. It appears easier to be male than female.
Why? Well, one reason I believe is because we are living our lives on social media so every decision is dramatic for high impact. The drama exhausts me, but there are no longer any easy decisions. Everything has consequences and maybe always has, but it seems more so now.
Thirty years ago there was a time when I sat in my mother’s office and believed God was in His heaven and all was right with the world. My mother emitted that kind of confidence, but also crazy people didn’t dominate the landscape. I clung to the illusion that America was the most powerful nation on earth. The world wasn’t at peace, but we, as Americans, felt safe on our soil.
My mother couldn’t have solved today’s problems. I know that. And in fact as she aged she worried more and more. In reality it would probably be me saying “there, there, now, now” to her rather than the other way around.
But she was my first anchor. And when the world appears to be staring into the abyss, I find the need to ground myself in sanity more and more. Today I wish I was scrambling to send her flowers or Harry and David’s because this weekend has crept up on me rather than remembering how much I miss her.
I am also thinking about my heroine and her relationship with her mother. Incorporating these feelings into a story is what we do because the first rule of being a writer is to bring universal truths to the reader even if they are only from your own perspective.
Ebooks And The Power Of Free …by Susan Lute
Next month will mark our two year anniversary doing this blog. Hard to believe, isn’t it? It’s been an interesting
journey. I’d say we’ve learned a lot, but we’re not done yet. Personally, I’ve arrived at the portal of the free ebook. Does it have the power to boost sales?
If you’ve been watching Darla Luke’s column USA Today Best-Selling Self-Published Books, you’ll know one of our Pacific Northwest Authors, Elizabeth Naughton stayed on that list for nearly two months. You can read about her journey at her blog, and on May 9th we are excited to have Elizabeth right here at See Jane Publish answering our own questions about how to boost sales.
There are as many opinions about the effect of the free ebook on sales as there are Indie authors, the most predominant, Yes, it works; No, it doesn’t! My humble opinion is that it does work, but with a caveat. And maybe lowering the book price to $.99 would do the same thing. I haven’t tested that out, so I don’t know. Keep in mind others will have differing experiences. One of the things I know about self-publishing is that it’s one great big science experiment. What works for one author doesn’t always work for another.
Marie Force gives away her first novel in her McCarthys of Gansett Island Series, Maid For Love, as part of her strategy to introduce new readers to her books. Her sales have been phenomenal and have allowed her to quit the day job, which I think is most writers number one goal. What Elizabeth and Marie have in common is that they both have long series; Marie, her McCarthys and Fatal series; Elizabeth, her Eternal Guardians. Even though Wait For Me was contemporary romance, it has still stimulated sales of all her books.
And then there’s Alexandra Sokoloff who gave away 50 ebooks of her new release Blood Moon for the potential opportunity to get reviews (check out her post, Blue Moon and e publishing, again). I love this idea. How many of you would perhaps be willing to post reviews to Amazon, BN, and Goodreads for a free e-copy of a novel?
I have tried the free ebook three times, with differing results. I don’t have ready access to the numbers – still on vacation – but I can give you the general results. Five days free at Amazon, Jane’s Long March Home (contemporary romance), inspiring results, but I didn’t have a series for readers to continue buying. I’m working on that now. The same five days for The London Affair, frankly lackluster results due in part I think, because it’s women’s fiction with a smaller audience. And just concluding five days free at Amazon, The Return of Benjamin Quincy, exciting numbers, not a spectacular as Jane’s, but exciting none the less. My conclusion: free has the greatest power when you have a long series to lure the reader into, and when you leave the book free for longer than five days, which means not doing it through Amazon’s KDP program, but by using a price matching strategy.
One last note: Jessa Slade has a new enterprise, Red Circle Ink. I can highly recommend her editing skills. She gives phenomenal feedback. Good luck, Jessa!
Boston Marathon Bombers Story Arc…. by Nancy Brophy
Putting together a cohesive story is difficult. If it wasn’t, everyone who thinks to himself, “I could write a novel,” would. And it would be a best seller, otherwise why write? And really how difficult can it be? We’re surrounding by stories every day.
Stories must have two arcs – External and Internal. The external or plot simply answers the question: What is the purpose of the story?
The external arc must be tangible. In action/adventure such as the recent events in Boston that is easy enough to see. Indiana Jones is going after the Skull, the Arc or the sacred rock. Frodo has to dispose of the ring. People have to save themselves from a disaster. The world is coming to an end. The Titanic is sinking. A run-away Russian submarine is on the loose.
The Boston Marathon bombing has a pretty straight forward external arc. Create mayhem, destruction and death – first at the marathon and then Times Square. It is the story of small men with small dreams. Movies have taught us that a big man’s dream would have been the overthrow of the entire nation.
We all know every story must evoke emotion and a senseless bombing scene will not garner public empathy. There must be a secondary or underlying arc that builds on the emotional storyline.
Once the Boston marathon bombers were captured, what was our most pressing concern?
Why would anyone do this? And we still don’t know all the details. But many of us are waiting with bated breath, because we want the story to have a nice tidy ending. We don’t want to hear that the men were simply crazy or misguided. We want to know what they thought they would accomplish and whether or not they believed they would get caught. A couple of day ago I learned that three of the younger brother’s friends helped hide and destroy evidence that had been stashed in his room pretty much in open sight. That doesn’t sound like a guy who was worried about the consequences of his actions.
One of the most shocking facts was that his friends volunteered to destroy the evidence. Where is their social conscience? How does friend loyalty trump the death of innocents? And worse where are the parents of these young men? Why aren’t they jumping up and down screaming at their sons, “have you lost your mind?”
The underlying arc must satisfy those details. It must show growth and must have a satisfying ending. For me, that usually means the evil get punished. Having written that, I’m sure you can imagine how I would like the Bomber story to end – not just for the younger bomber but for his friends, as well.
Each of the protagonists must have both an internal and external arc, not to mention the only female lead on American soil needs her two arcs as well. With enough characters the story line resembles a complex genome map. In this case both brothers had arcs, but so did the wife and the mother. I’m sure the friends also had storylines, but they appear to only be spear carriers, not plotters.
Personally, I find it difficult to believe that the wife was totally unaware of what was happening, particularly as the husband became more and more verbal about his radicalization.
And the mother…
Well, the mother is a piece of work, isn’t she? Another reason I suspect so many of us write about dysfunctional families –we are surrounded by them. Apparently being Russian does not exempt anyone.
The truth is none of us would write the bombers as the heroes. We would choose the story of one of the three who died, or one of the 260 bystanders who lives changed forever because they lost a limb, or even those who lost a family member.
The boys aren’t heroes, but I bet they wanted to be. Apparently they didn’t watch enough American television to figure out that protagonists seldom set out to become heroes. They just are.










